Tuesday, August 28, 2018

Write Covered Calls to Create Cash-flows during Market Corrections

Pros often use advanced options as one of their market strategies to manage portfolios. While professional options strategies require advanced knowledge of quantitative sciences, simple options hardly require any such knowledge. In fact, buying some calls to take advantage of the rising markets or buying some puts to hedge downturns is quite straightforward.

More importantly, the practice of writing covered calls, meaning selling calls against existing positions, to create cash-flows when market gets overbought or is ready for an imminent correction is considered an excellent market strategy even for the individual investors in stocks, bonds, commodities, foreign exchanges and real estate.

Considering the safety of writing covered calls, it is even allowed in IRA accounts.

Buying vs. Selling Calls

While options-approved individual and professional investors often buy calls to take advantage of the rising markets, buying calls carries an inherent risk if the market suddenly turns negative or moves sideways, thus making those calls worthless or at least significantly eroding their time value. Of course, if the market behaves as expected those calls gain in value. Therefore, buying calls is a speculative strategy, if not a total gamble.  

On the other hand, writing covered calls could be a very sound investment strategy to hedge market downturns or overbought conditions. For example, if you bought 1,000 X stocks at $30 (cost basis) at the bottom of the last correction and the same stock is now trading at $45, you may consider writing up to 10 covered calls (each option covers 100 shares) to create some temporary cash-flows, without having to liquidate the position. 

Of course, the mere fact that your stock has made a decent run-up should not force you to sell some calls. Make sure your research shows that the market is ready to correct or is way overbought, or at least, your stock is way ahead of the market and is showing clear signs of an overbought condition. One such sign could be the breach of a statistically significant trend-line, e.g., the 200-day moving average. In such a changed market situation, writing some covered calls is an excellent way to create some meaningful cash-flows.

Ideally, calls should be written against 50% of the covered positions, positioning the rest to ride out the market or to take advantage of the further upside potential in the market just in case your research turns out somewhat ill-timed. Of course, any such options strategy must always be reached in consultation with a registered investment professional to minimize speculation.

Again, while I am opposed to buying options – calls or puts – I am always in favor of writing limited calls as long as the aforesaid market conditions are met and proper professional help is part and parcel of the decision-making process.


In the money vs. At the money vs. Out of the money

Options have two value attributes – intrinsic value and time value. Option contracts that are expiring shortly, say in six weeks, will have lesser time value than those expiring in six months. Therefore, while buying options it is always advisable to buy with adequate time, preferably six to nine months remaining on the contract.

Likewise, while selling options, immediate contract months are preferred as market conditions are more predictable. Therefore, if your research shows the market could decline or remain range-bound and choppy in next 3 months, consider writing your covered calls keeping the option’s expiration in mind. Of course, the equally important question you would face is: Should you write those calls in the money, at the money, or out of the money? 

Since your stock is now trading at $45, the $45 strike price would be at the money, while $40 would be in the money and $50 would be out of the money. In other words, in the money options have higher intrinsic value than their counterparts. Again, if your research shows your particular stock has recently made a significant move – well ahead of the competition – and is therefore expected to retrace more than the overall market and the competition, consider writing the covered calls in the money, factoring in the potentially bigger pull-back. On the other hand, if you are expecting a pull-back in line with the market as well as the competition, stay with at the money or out of the money covered calls.

Either way, as market trends lower dragging the time value down, you can always cover (buy back) your position at a fraction of your original selling price. You can repeat this process again at the top of the next bull-run. Conversely, if your research proves wrong and the market continues to trend up subsequent to the writing of the covered calls, your other unencumbered 50% position will participate in the market.

Always consult a licensed investment advisor before engaging in any options activity as it involves significant risks.

- Sid Som MBA, MIM
President, Homequant, Inc.

Wednesday, August 22, 2018

A Diversified REIT ETF may Proxy Physical Real Estates in an Asset Allocation Model

- Intended for Start-up Analysts and Researchers -


The Correlation Matrix (top graphic) shows the correlation between S&P 500 and five publicly traded Real Estate Investment Trust (REIT) ETFs. While MORT is a mortgage REIT, the other four are diversified equity (Real Estate) REITs. 

The Correlation Matrix shows almost negligible correlations between S&P 500 and the REITs. This lack of correlation entices investors to own REITs as a separate asset class in their asset allocation model, proxying a portfolio of diversified real estates (residential, commercial and industrial), without having to own and manage them physically. 

In order to maintain the tax advantage status, REITs have to pay out at least 90% of their income as dividend. Since REITs are designed to yield higher dividends, they tend to complement the fixed income (asset) class in the asset allocation model as well.

Correlation coefficients ranging between + 0.10 and -0.10 are considered uncorrelated. VNQ is the only one that falls outside of that range, showing slightly negative correlation. Save MORT, the other four equity REITs are moving in lockstep, considering their top holdings (accounting for at least 35% of the portfolio) are virtually alike (e.g., American Tower, Simon Property, Crown Castle, Prologis, Public Storage, Avalon Bay, Equinix, Equity Residential, Digital Realty, etc.).

Though Mortgage REITs tend to generate much higher yields than their equity (real estate) counterparts, they are inherently more volatile as they are more prone to interest rate fluctuations. MORT currently has a yield of 7.77% as compared to 3% to 4% for the equity ones.
     
The weekly graph (bottom graphic) is more telling. While S&P 500 moved from 2,400 to 2,800 (between 8/1/17 and 7/31/18), both REITs (IYR and VNQ) remained range bound between $74 and $82. As a result, the diversified equity REITs have low beta as well (usually between 0.5 and 0.7). 

Again, a diversified equity REIT ETF could be an excellent way to own this asset class (a wide variety of real estates) without having to physically own and manage them.


Disclaimer - The author is not advocating any of the ETFs/indices listed here. Consult your Registered Rep, RIA or Financial Planner for an appropriate asset allocation model and the suitability of stocks and other holdings for your portfolio.

- Sid Som, MBA, MIM
President, Homequant, Inc.

Saturday, August 4, 2018

High-Low Ratio is a Good Way to Measure Volatility of Stock Market Averages and Indices

(Click on the image to enlarge)

-- Intended for Start-up Analysts and Researchers --

Stock market Volatility, particularly highly liquid individual stocks, averages and indices can be defined by the ratio of their Daily Highs and Lows. Simply put, the higher ratio represents higher volatility and vice versa. 

The Daily Volatility chart shows an elevated volatility in February through early April, gradually tapering in May, June and July. While the median ratio during this 7-month period was 1.01, it exceeded 1.04 on four occasions in February and 1.03 on five occasions thereafter. Obviously, the February standard deviation was significantly higher than the overall (Feb 0.0158 vs. Overall 0.0093).

As expected, the Weekly Volatility chart shows more extreme volatility as it depicts the weekly highs and lows. For instance, the median ratio and standard deviation were 1.0244 and 0.0180, respectively. The volatility peaked at 1.0925 (week of February 5th), keying off the weekly high of 25,521 and low of 23,360. Additionally, it exceeded 1.04 on six occasions - a wow feat indeed! The volatility waned in May-July.

If you decide to present one chart, the Weekly one is more meaningful as it cuts through the daily noise and hones in on true extremes. In that case, add the trendline. You may also normalize it by Closing Prices, making it more predictive.

Good Luck! 

Sid Som, MBA, MIM
President, Homequant, Inc.
homequant@gmail.com